The Washington Post ran an article by a FemiNazi on her repulsion with men giving her “unwanted attention”. Now, I understand the fact no one likes un-wanted attention, in fact, it feels oddly repulsive. Just imagine an obese feminazi rubbing up against you and whispering in your ears “take me big boy, i’m all yours”…. Ewwww, right?
What I don’t like however is the Crime the feminazi want to turn it into. Especially with hypocrisy they run it by.
Apparently women are “disgusted” and “grossed out”, by men calling out to them on the street.
What are they calling out? Are these men saying stuff like “you ugly c**t?” to random women? No, not even close, they’re actually saying such atrocities as “wow, you look beautiful” and “Hey there sexy” or “Good morning”.
Oh, but they must like be groping them and following them, right?
No, none of that. Just commenting about their appearance or trying to start a conversation.
[sarcasm]How incredibly painful and hurtful[/sarcasm]
It kind of reminds me of women ranting about dating actions, especially ones they never undertake. Such as what we’ve all heard from our female friends.
Woman 1: “What an asshole, i gave my number to this guy and he waited 3 days to call me!”
Woman 2: “What an idiot, I gave him my number, and he called me the next day! what a dork, don’t men have any sense and learn to wait!?!”.
Woman 3: “Sure I gave him my number, but why did he call me, doesn’t he know you don’t call women like that”
Woman 4: “What a jerk, I gave him my number and the bastard won’t call! MEN! All they do is lead you on!”
You know, these examples are not only real, but what makes them funny is often you’ll hear them from the same woman in different situations. Pointing to how women can easily miss how the confuse the bejesus out of men about what is “proper”.
Which is kind of funny, since these same women have never ever in their life had to ask a man out or do the phone number getting, so it’s kind of hypocritical of them to be the ones criticizing.
It’s the same with these complaints on cat-calling. Ok, so these catcaller guys are sleazy, uncalibrated and socially-retarded… So?
They’re at least doing something, unlike the Washington-Post writer who hasn’t had to start a conversation with a man in her entire life. And goes around giving people the middle-finger. It’s easy to be the one ranting about “un-movie like approaches” when you’re the lazy side of the process.
Fact: Being sleazy about the way you approach women is well, sleazy, no doubt about that, in fact it’s lame
Fact: Ranting and victimizing about it when you’re the one who has it easy, makes you sleazier than the actual sleaze.
Question to heterosexual feminazi? Would you rather than no man ever again approached you, asked you out or complimented you, nor noticed your looks? If it meant an end to all “bad approaches”? —> In other words: Would you trade never ever ever again being approached or asked out or complimented if it meant a stop to all bad ones?
Now, obviously, I’m bringing it to an extreme. But the truth is, that everything has it’s consequences and side-effects. If you’re being the passive side, you need to accept the side-effects it brings. If you like being the approached one, then you have to know there will be approaches you don’t like either. If you ever like being perceived as an attractive person, accept that not all attention to your image will be of the type you like or intend.
Simple Test: Jot down the number of times you approached a man you liked. Now jot down the number of times you waited for a guy you like to approach you.
Jot down the number of times you’ve asked a guy out, and jot down the number of times you waited for a guy to ask you out,
Now, jot down the number of times you initiated a first kiss, and jot down the number of times the man did.
If these numbers are far from being 50-50 (equality, yo!), and unequal in the direction of you being the passive one, that is (IMHO) a very subtle sign of hypocrisy. You want to have your cake and be able to eat it too. “I want every single man to act in the exact manner in which I imagine a perfect man would act.”
If you want your approaches to always be of the perfect manner, start approaching. You are the only person who’s actions you can control. Only you know your preferences and taste. If you want all your experiences with men to be like you want them, then start initiating them.
My opinion is that… if every single woman on the planet decided to make use of equality within the dating field, and approach and initiate kissing and potentially sex as often as she wanted to… Virtually 95% of “unwanted attention” from men would disappear… as men wouldn’t need to play Russian roulette… and hence, so would disappear the sleazebags.
Some hilarious quotes from the original article
8 a.m. in Mount Pleasant. Last night’s dress and heels—risky—but I need to pop home and think early hour + short distance = no danger. Wrong. A few guys who are in an apartment above street level have a great time yelling out, “Ooh! How are you? Good morning! So beautiful! Damn! Look at her! Hello?! Hey, sexy,” and whatever else; goes on for at least half that block. I give them the finger.
Ten minutes later, walking back, having changed into tank and jeans. The upstairs guys are gone, but a guy in a car I walk by while crossing the street hangs out of it at me and says: “Good morning! Damn!”
Because saying good-morning is now considered harassment…
There’s a problem with that ego-centric approach of “He was so sleazy the way he said “good morning damn”". Not all women are like you. The perfect approach for you, is another woman’s “approach from hell”. Your gross compliment is another woman’s “attention from heaven” and vice-versa of course. The perfect approach for you, is another woman’s “lame, dorky” approach.
Source: WashingtonPost article
